PROTECTING WISCONSIN'S BIODIVERSITY

 
 
   
 
Community Name Global Rank State Rank Community Group

Southern Tamarack Swamp

DSCN0011_clark.jpg

 

 

9096.jpg

Photo by Andy Clark

 

Counties with Mapped NHI Occurrences

Formerly known as tamarack rich swamp, this forested minerotrophic wetland community is dominated by tamarack (Larix laricina) and red maple (Acer rubrum). Other swamp hardwoods such as yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), black ash (Fraxinus nigra), and American elm (Ulmus americana) are occasional. The shrub layer is more diverse and structurally complex than in the more acidic bog relicts with poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix) and winterberry (Ilex verticillata) often abundant. Speckled alder (Alnus incana) and mountain holly (Ilex mucronatus) may also be present in some sites.

Southern tamarack swamp sites are usually supported by groundwater seepage and can include plants such as skunk-cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), swamp loosestrife (Lysimachia thyrsiflora), swamp dewberry (Rubus pubescens), fowl manna grass (Glyceria striata), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), and marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris). Sphagnum moss can be present in low amounts but is discontinuous and never dominant. Soils reflect the minerotrophic groundwater influence and are usually muck to mucky peat and are weakly to moderately acidic (pH >5.5).

Historically, southern tamarack swamps occurred extensively in parts of southeastern Wisconsin and on the eastern margin of Glacial Lake Wisconsin. Many of them were drained and cleared for agricultural purposes. Intact examples are now uncommon but occur in a wide variety of settings, such as on the margins of lakes or streams, at the base of moraines, in outwash areas, and in a few Driftless Area stream valleys. With the decline of tamarack in southern Wisconsin due to climate change, insect pests, and fire suppression, many sites are transitioning to other community types. Non-native invasive species, especially glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus), are especially problematic in many sites.

 
 
 

Southern tamarack swamps are characterized by their minerotrophic organic soils of weakly to moderately acidic (pH >5.5) muck to mucky peat, canopy dominated by tamarack and swamp hardwood associates, and prevalence of tall shrubs, especially poison sumac and winterberry. They are most similar to bog relicts, but bog relicts have more acidic peat soils (pH 3.0-5.0), much higher coverage of Sphagnum moss (>40% cover, often approaching 90% cover) and higher coverage of ericaceous shrubs, especially leatherleaf and huckleberry. Bog relicts may have a sparse to moderate tamarack canopy but lack the hardwood associates and abundance of nutrient demanding shrubs.

Southern tamarack swamps have many species in common with northern hardwood swamps but the latter is usually dominated by hardwoods with tamarack usually sparse to absent. While northern hardwood swamps are more common in northern Wisconsin, they can be found scattered throughout southern Wisconsin in areas of calcareous groundwater seepage.

Southern tamarack swamps are also similar to northern tamarack swamps but the latter tends to be more acidic with a lower prevalence of strong calciphiles like poison sumac. Although the two communities are generally confined to the southern and northern parts of the state, respectively, they do overlap somewhat in the Central Sands region. Although this region is within and south of Wisconsin's climatic tension zone, northern tamarack swamps are common in the ancient lakebed of Glacial Lake Wisconsin where flat, acid peatlands are underlain by nutrient-poor sands. Just to the east in the end moraines above the ancient lakeplain, southern tamarack swamps predominate due to the more minerotrophic groundwater seeping through the calcareous glacial deposits. Thus, nutrient status and the relative abundance of nutrient-demanding species is more useful than latitude in differentiating the two communities.

Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are associated with habitats (or natural communities) and places on the landscape. Understanding relationships among SGCN, natural communities and ecological landscapes help us make decisions about issues affecting SGCN and their habitat and how to respond. Download the Wildlife Action Plan association score spreadsheet to explore rare species, natural communities and ecological landscape associations

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.