PROTECTING WISCONSIN'S BIODIVERSITY

 
 
   
 
Community Name Global Rank State Rank Community Group

Northern Tamarack Swamp

HER_PF106.jpg

 

 

9097.jpg

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz

 

Counties with Mapped NHI Occurrences

Also known as tamarack poor swamp, these weakly to moderately minerotrophic conifer swamps are dominated by a broken to closed canopy of tamarack (Larix laricina) and a frequently dense understory of speckled alder (Alnus incana), mountain holly (Ilex mucronata), winterberry (Ilex verticillata), black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa), and bog birch (Betula pumila). The understory is more diverse than in black spruce swamps and may include more nutrient-demanding species such as black ash (Fraxinus nigra). The bryophytes include many genera other than Sphagnum. Stands with spring seepage sometimes have marsh-marigold (Caltha palustris) and skunk-cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) as common understory inhabitants.

 
 
 

Northern tamarack swamps are characterized by their moderately minerotrophic soil, canopy dominated by tamarack, and prevalence of tall shrubs, usually with at least 5% cover, often up to 25% cover or more. While tamarack may co-dominate (or even be locally dominant in) black spruce swamps, that community has more acidic soil, a sparse layer of tall shrubs (5% cover or less), and a more continuous carpet of Sphagnum moss. While Sphagnum moss occurs in northern tamarack swamps, it usually forms a discontinuous layer and is concentrated on hummocks elevated above the moderately minerotrophic groundwater or surface water. Northern tamarack swamps sometimes grade into alder thickets, which are generally classified as having fewer trees (<25% cover, usually much less) and higher coverage of tall shrubs (50% cover or more). Northern tamarack swamps also occur adjacent to central poor fens, which are also generally classified as having no more than 25% cover of trees.

Northern tamarack swamps are similar to southern tamarack swamps, but the latter tend to be more minerotrophic with a greater prevalence of calciphiles such as poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix). Although the two communities generally occur in the northern and southern parts of the state, respectively, they do overlap somewhat in the central sands region. Although the region is within and south of Wisconsin's climatic tension zone, northern tamarack swamps are common in the ancient lakebed of Glacial Lake Wisconsin where flat, acid peatlands are underlain by nutrient-poor sands. Just to the east in the hills above the ancient lakeplain, southern tamarack swamps predominate due to the more minerotrophic groundwater seeping through the calcareous glacial deposits. Thus, nutrient status and the relative abundance of calciphitic species is more useful than latitude in differentiating the two communities.

Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are associated with habitats (or natural communities) and places on the landscape. Understanding relationships among SGCN, natural communities and ecological landscapes help us make decisions about issues affecting SGCN and their habitat and how to respond. Download the Wildlife Action Plan association score spreadsheet to explore rare species, natural communities and ecological landscape associations

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.