PROTECTING WISCONSIN'S BIODIVERSITY

 
 
   
 
Community Name Global Rank State Rank Community Group

Great Lakes Shore Fen

HER_SF_200.jpg

 

 

9112.jpg

Photo by Eric Epstein

 

Counties with Mapped NHI Occurrences

This open peatland community occurs along the shorelines of the Great Lakes, near the mouths of estuarine streams, and in association with sandspit landforms. Great Lakes shore fen is locally common along the southwestern shore of Lake Superior because the basin is slowly subsiding due to differential isostatic rebound from the last episode of Pleistocene glaciation. This has created conditions along the Wisconsin shore that favor the development of drowned river mouths, sandspits, and extensive peatland complexes. Shore fens are generally in direct contact with clear, cold, circumneutral (pH ~7) waters of low nutrient status.

A characteristic floating sedge mat is dominated by wire-leaved graminoid plants, including woolly sedge (Carex lasiocarpa), twig-rush (Cladium mariscoides), sweet gale (Myrica gale), and buckbean (Menyanthes trifoliata). Other common herbs in the floristically diverse coastal fens of the Lake Superior region include marsh horsetail (Equisetum palustre), marsh bellflower (Campanula aparinoides), intermediate bladderwort (Utricularia intermedia), lesser bladderwort (Utricularia minor), water bulrush (Schoenoplectus subterminalis), elliptic spike-rush (Eleocharis elliptica), narrow-leaved willow-herb (Epilobium leptophyllum), water-parsnip (Sium suave), and bog willow (Salix pedicellaris). Sooty beak-rush (Rhynchospora fusca) and the rare coast sedge (Carex exilis) are locally common in some coastal fens on the Apostle Islands. The floating sedge mat is often bordered on the downslope side by a lagoon that supports marsh vegetation composed of varying mixtures of submergent, floating-leaved, and emergent species. Toward higher ground and in the shallower portions of the peatland basins, the mat is grounded. Sphagnum mosses become increasingly important and accumulate as peat, and there are significant changes in fen composition. These sphagnum-based, herbaceous peatland communities are classified as poor fens.

 
 
 

Great Lakes shore fens are distinguished by their circumneutral to calciphitic flora and their proximity to the Great Lakes, located in embayments, lagoons, and river mouths with water levels influenced by Great Lakes hydrology. They are distinguished from the more acidic open bogs and poor fens (which may adjoin them in the same wetland complex) by their scarcity or lack of Sphagnum moss species, low ericad cover, higher pH, and the presence of a direct hydrologic connection to the waters of the Great Lakes. They are distinguished from boreal rich fens by their lower pH and the absence of "rich" peatland indicator species such as linear-leaved sundew (Drosera linearis), grass-of-parnassus (Parnassia glauca), common bog arrow-grass (Triglochin maritima), and false asphodel (Triantha glutinosa). Great Lakes shore fens also share similarities with northern sedge meadows, especially when dominated by wiregrass sedge (Carex lasiocarpa), but occur in drowned river mouths or coastal embayments, often have a floating mat, and have a high prevalence of calciphiles (see description), all of which are atypical for sedge meadows.

Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are associated with habitats (or natural communities) and places on the landscape. Understanding relationships among SGCN, natural communities and ecological landscapes help us make decisions about issues affecting SGCN and their habitat and how to respond. Download the Wildlife Action Plan association score spreadsheet to explore rare species, natural communities and ecological landscape associations

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.