PROTECTING WISCONSIN'S BIODIVERSITY

 
 
   
 
Community Name Global Rank State Rank Community Group

Shrub-carr

LM11-08_Judziewicz.jpg

 

 

9119.jpg

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz

 

Counties with Mapped NHI Occurrences

Shrub-carr is a wetland community dominated by tall shrubs such as red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), meadowsweet (Spiraea alba), and various willows (Salix spp.). Canada bluejoint grass (Calamagrostis canadensis) is often very common. Associates are similar to those found in alder thickets and tussock-type sedge meadows. Shrub-carrs occupy areas that are transitional between open wetlands like wet prairies, calcareous fens, and southern sedge meadows, and forested wetlands such as floodplain forests and southern hardwood swamps. Shrub-carrs can persist at a given site for a very long time if natural hydrologic cycles are maintained. This type often occurs in bands around lakes or ponds, on the margins of river floodplains, or, more extensively, in glacial lakebeds. It is common and widespread in southern Wisconsin but also occurs in the north. In the south, shrub-carrs were often an integral part of prairie-savanna landscapes, though they also occurred in wetlands in more forested regions. In the north, the landscape matrix around the shrub-carr type was usually upland forest. Statewide, shrub-carrs remain quite common and have fared considerably better than many other native wetland communities in its range.

Past drainage and marsh hay mowing likely had a negative effect on shrub-carrs, whereas clearing of conifer swamps likely produced more of this habitat. Once fire was controlled and hay mowing was discontinued in lowland meadows, shrub-carrs likely increased in extent. Drainage of meadows and marshes has also allowed shrub-carr habitats to increase in some areas. As a result of wetland drainage and fire suppression, shrub-carrs now occupy many sites that formerly supported much more extensive marsh, wet meadow, prairie, and fen vegetation, and therefore, they are sometimes targeted for elimination. However, shrub-carr is an important native wetland type that has its place on our landscape and should be protected, managed, and restored at appropriate sites.

 
 
 

Shrub-carr is defined as having few trees and generally 50% cover of shrubs or more, often with at least 4 or 5 species that are co-dominant. It is similar to alder thicket, but can be distinguished by having several shrub species that share dominance (especially willows and dogwoods). While alder is often present in a shrub-carr (especially in northern Wisconsin), it should comprise less than half of the relative shrub cover. Shrub-carr often intergrades with southern sedge meadow (and sometimes calcareous fen). While southern sedge meadow has less than 50% cover of tall shrubs, either community can constitute the dominant matrix community, with pockets of the non-matrix community embedded within. Shrub-carrs in southeastern Wisconsin also share similarities with bog relicts, but bog relicts have a partial canopy of tamarack, high abundance of poison sumac, and prevalence of ericaceous shrubs. Shrub-carrs also border and intergrade with forested wetlands like southern tamarack swamps and floodplain forests, but can be differentiated by having, on average, less than 25% cover of trees.

Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are associated with habitats (or natural communities) and places on the landscape. Understanding relationships among SGCN, natural communities and ecological landscapes help us make decisions about issues affecting SGCN and their habitat and how to respond. Download the Wildlife Action Plan association score spreadsheet to explore rare species, natural communities and ecological landscape associations

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.