Manitowoc
No
No
No
Fish and Aquatic Life
Overview
OSMAN TRIBUTARY TO MEEME RIVER, MANITOWOC COUNTY
T17N R22E Sec. 14 Stream Length = 5.1
The Osman tributary to the Meeme River is located west of the intersection of CTH X and STH 42. The stream consists of the main stem (1.3 miles), the East Branch (2.1 miles) and the West Branch (1.7 miles) for a total stream length of 5.1 miles. The stream currently supports a limited forage fish (LFF) community, but has the capability to support a warmwater forage fish (WWFF) community (Aartila 1997). The fish community collected during the 1996 stream appraisal monitoring included brook stickleback, central mudminnow, creek chub, fathead minnow, white sucker and blacknose dace.
The macroinvertebrate community samples collected during 1996 had HBI ratings of “fairly poor” indicating the presence of significant organic pollution. The factors keeping this stream from meeting it’s full potential use are loss of fish and macroinvertebrate habitat, embedded substrates, nuisance algae, and low dissolved oxygen. The sources are channelization, barnyard and cropland runoff, roadside erosion, streambank erosion, and drain tiles.
Date 2001
Author Aquatic Biologist
Overview
OSMAN TRIBUTARY TO MEEME RIVER, MANITOWOC COUNTY - T17N R22E Sec. 14, Stream Length = 5.1.
The Osman tributary to the Meeme River is located west of the intersection of CTH X and STH 42. The stream consists of the main stem (1.3 miles), the East Branch (2.1 miles) and the West Branch (1.7 miles) for a total stream length of 5.1 miles. The stream currently supports a limited forage fish (LFF) community, but has the capability to support a warmwater forage fish (WWFF) community (Aartila 1997). The fish community collected during the 1996 stream appraisal monitoring included brook stickleback, central mudminnow, creek chub, fathead minnow, white sucker and blacknose dace.
The macroinvertebrate community samples collected during 1996 had Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) ratings of “fairly poor” indicating the presence of significant organic pollution. The factors keeping this stream from meeting it’s full potential use are loss of fish and macroinvertebrate habitat, embedded substrates, nuisance algae, and low dissolved oxygen. The sources are channelization, barnyard and cropland runoff, roadside erosion, streambank erosion, and drain tiles.
From: Galarneau, Steve and Masterson, John. 1999. Water Resources of the Sheboygan River Basin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.
Date 1999
Author Aquatic Biologist
Condition
Wisconsin has over 84,000 miles of streams, 15,000 lakes and milllions of acres of wetlands. Assessing the condition of this vast amount of water is challenging. The state's water monitoring program uses a media-based, cross-program approach to analyze water condition. An updated monitoring strategy (2015-2020) is now available. Compliance with Clean Water Act fishable, swimmable standards are located in the Executive Summary of Water Condition in 2018. See also the 'monitoring and projects' tab.
Management Goals
Wisconsin's Water Quality Standards provide qualitative and quantitative goals for waters that are protective of Fishable, Swimmable conditions [Learn more]. Waters that do not meet water quality standards are considered impaired and restoration actions are planned and carried out until the water is once again fishable and swimmable
Management goals can include creation or implementation of a Total Maximum Daily Load analysis, a Nine Key Element Plan, or other restoration work, education and outreach and more. If specific recommendations exist for this water, they will be displayed below online.
Monitoring
Monitoring the condition of a river, stream, or lake includes gathering physical, chemical, biological, and habitat data. Comprehensive studies often gather all these parameters in great detail, while lighter assessment events will involve sampling physical, chemical and biological data such as macroinvertebrates. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities integrate watershed or catchment condition, providing great insight into overall ecosystem health. Chemical and habitat parameters tell researchers more about human induced problems including contaminated runoff, point source dischargers, or habitat issues that foster or limit the potential of aquatic communities to thrive in a given area. Wisconsin's Water Monitoring Strategy was recenty updated.
Grants and Management Projects
Project Name (Click for Details) | Year Started |
---|
|
|
Monitoring Projects
WBIC | Official Waterbody Name | Station ID | Station Name | Earliest Fieldwork Date | Latest Fieldwork Date | View Station | View Data |
---|
|
|
Watershed Characteristics
Unnamed is located in the Pigeon River watershed which is 78.87 miĀ². Land use in the watershed is primarily agricultural (57.30%), grassland (18.60%) and a mix of forest (10.20%) and other uses (13.90%). This watershed has 110.34 stream miles, 769.54 lake acres and 3,149.60 wetland acres.
Nonpoint Source Characteristics
This watershed is ranked High for runoff impacts on streams, Not Ranked for runoff impacts on lakes and High for runoff impacts on groundwater and therefore has an overall rank of High. This value can be used in ranking the watershed or individual waterbodies for grant funding under state and county programs.However, all waters are affected by diffuse pollutant sources regardless of initial water quality. Applications for specific runoff projects under state or county grant programs may be pursued. For more information, go to surface water program grants.