5.26 Miles
21.11 - 26.37
Macroinvertebrate, Cool-Cold Headwater, Coldwater
2024
Fair
Pierce
No
No
No
Fish and Aquatic Life
Overview
A 1991 streambank erosion survey of Plum Creek to assess effects on water quality in Nugget Lake
found that 17 percent of the bank area along Plum Creek above Nugget Lake is eroding. A recent
fish survey showed a Class I1 trout fishery below Nugget Lake (Spangler, 1993). Sedimentation and
nutrient enrichment of Nugget Lake have the ~otential to affect water temperature and water
quality in Plum Creek (Engel). Stream improvements and changes in surrounding land use practices
could improve Plum Creek to a Class I trout stream (Holzer). The amount of ammonia+'contributed
by the Plum City wastewater treatment plant has the ~otential to harm the fishery under low flow
conditions. WDNR standards and policies for ammonia are under revision (LaLiberte).
Plum Creek in Pepin County will be included in the county's conservation credit ~ i l o t project.
Pepin County is pursuing approvals to move ahead with a unique approach to protect water
resources, termed the Conservation Credit Initiative, which would reward long-term farm practices
that ultimately protect and improve water resources. The reward comes in the form of tax credits.
See the Pepin County discussion in the Groundwater Report for more information on ths topic.
Date 1996
Author Aquatic Biologist
Impaired Waters
Plum Creek from Pepin county CTH SS upstream to Pierce County CTH U (miles 7.2 - 13.3) was evaluated in the 2022 cycle: phosphorus levels were above listing thresholds as outlined in 2022 WisCALM. This stream was added to the 2022 Impaired Waters List.
Date 2022
Author Ashley Beranek
Impaired Waters
The 2018 assessments of Plum Creek (mouth with Chippewa River to HWY SS (mile 7.23)) showed impairment by phosphorus; new total phosphorus sample data exceeded the 2018 WisCALM listing criteria for the Fish and Aquatic Life use. However, available biological data did not indicate impairment (i.e. no macroinvertebrate or fish Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scored in the "poor" condition category). Based on the most updated information, this water was proposed for the impaired waters list.
Date 2017
Author Ashley Beranek
Condition
Wisconsin has over 84,000 miles of streams, 15,000 lakes and milllions of acres of wetlands. Assessing the condition of this vast amount of water is challenging. The state's water monitoring program uses a media-based, cross-program approach to analyze water condition. An updated monitoring strategy (2015-2020) is now available. Compliance with Clean Water Act fishable, swimmable standards are located in the Executive Summary of Water Condition in 2018. See also the 'monitoring and projects' tab.
Reports
Recommendations
Shoreland Ordinance
Pierce County proposes to amend or create a shoreland zoning ordinance that complies with the requirements of NR 115, Wisconsin Administrative Code (as revised effective February 1, 2010) and retain existing regulations that exceed the water resource protections of NR 115 or are specific or unique to local needs.
Restore Wetlands
Restore Wetlands
Management Goals
Wisconsin's Water Quality Standards provide qualitative and quantitative goals for waters that are protective of Fishable, Swimmable conditions [Learn more]. Waters that do not meet water quality standards are considered impaired and restoration actions are planned and carried out until the water is once again fishable and swimmable
Management goals can include creation or implementation of a Total Maximum Daily Load analysis, a Nine Key Element Plan, or other restoration work, education and outreach and more. If specific recommendations exist for this water, they will be displayed below online.
Monitoring
Monitoring the condition of a river, stream, or lake includes gathering physical, chemical, biological, and habitat data. Comprehensive studies often gather all these parameters in great detail, while lighter assessment events will involve sampling physical, chemical and biological data such as macroinvertebrates. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities integrate watershed or catchment condition, providing great insight into overall ecosystem health. Chemical and habitat parameters tell researchers more about human induced problems including contaminated runoff, point source dischargers, or habitat issues that foster or limit the potential of aquatic communities to thrive in a given area. Wisconsin's Water Monitoring Strategy was recenty updated.
Grants and Management Projects
Monitoring Projects
| WBIC | Official Waterbody Name | Station ID | Station Name | Earliest Fieldwork Date | Latest Fieldwork Date | View Station | View Data |
|---|
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 483076 | Plum Creek at Cth Hh | 10/11/1999 | 1/25/2000 | Map | Data |
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 10009095 | Plum Creek | | | Map | Data |
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 483050 | Plum Creek - Upstream From Nugget | | | Map | Data |
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 10009102 | 13 - Plum Creek - Cth Hh [13] | 4/15/1998 | 10/7/2024 | Map | Data |
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 10009085 | Plum Creek - upstreem of STH 72 (ST. 15) | | | Map | Data |
| 2051300 | Plum Creek | 10009090 | Plum Creek - 31 meters upstream of 490th Ave (ST. 14) | | | Map | Data |
|
Watershed Characteristics
Plum Creek is located in the Plum Creek watershed which is 140.59 mi². Land use in the watershed is primarily agricultural (43.30%), forest (38%) and a mix of grassland (12%) and other uses (6.70%). This watershed has 314.86 stream miles, 793.61 lake acres and 3,140.16 wetland acres.
Nonpoint Source Characteristics
This watershed is ranked Medium for runoff impacts on streams, High for runoff impacts on lakes and High for runoff impacts on groundwater and therefore has an overall rank of High. This value can be used in ranking the watershed or individual waterbodies for grant funding under state and county programs.However, all waters are affected by diffuse pollutant sources regardless of initial water quality. Applications for specific runoff projects under state or county grant programs may be pursued. For more information, go to surface water program grants.
Plum Creek is considered a Macroinvertebrate, Cool-Cold Headwater, Coldwater under the state's Natural Community Determinations.
Natural communities (stream and lake natural communities) represent model results and DNR staff valiation processes that confirm or update predicted conditions based on flow and temperature modeling from historic and current landscape features and related variables. Predicated flow and temperatures for waters are associated predicated fish assemblages (communities). Biologists evaluate the model results against current survey data to determine if the modeled results are corect and whether biological indicators show water quaity degradation. This analysis is a core component of the state's resource management framework. Wisconsin's Riverine Natural Communities.
Cool (Cold-Transition) Headwaters are small, usually perennial streams with cold to cool summer temperatures. Coldwater fishes are common to uncommon (<10 per 100 m), transitional fishes are abundant to common, and warm water fishes are uncommon to absent. Headwater species are abundant to common, mainstem species are common to absent, and river species are absent.