Hog Island Inlet, St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed (LS01)
Hog Island Inlet, St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed (LS01)
Hog Island Inlet (2751300)
18.51 Acres
Natural Community
Natural communities (stream and lake natural communities) represent model results that use predicted flow and temperature based on landscape features and related assumptions. Ranges of flow and temperature associated with specific aquatic life communities (fish, macroinvertebrates) help biologists identify appropriate resource management goals. Wisconsin Natural Communities.
Year Last Monitored
This is the most recent date of monitoring data stored in SWIMS. Additional surveys for fish and habitat may be available subsequent to this date.
2023
Poor
 
This bay/harbor is impaired
Chronic Aquatic Toxicity
Unspecified Metals, PAHs, Foam/Flocs/Scum/Oil Slicks
 
Douglas
Trout Water 
Trout Waters are represented by Class I, Class II or Class III waters. These classes have specific ecological characteristics and management actions associated with them. For more information regarding Trout Classifications, see the Fisheries Trout Class Webpages.
No
Outstanding or Exceptional 
Wisconsin has designated many of the state's highest quality waters as Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) or Exceptional Resource Waters (ERWs). Waters designated as ORW or ERW are surface waters which provide outstanding recreational opportunities, support valuable fisheries and wildlife habitat, have good water quality, and are not significantly impacted by human activities. ORW and ERW status identifies waters that the State of Wisconsin has determined warrant additional protection from the effects of pollution. These designations are intended to meet federal Clean Water Act obligations requiring Wisconsin to adopt an 'antidegradation' policy that is designed to prevent any lowering of water quality - especially in those waters having significant ecological or cultural value.
No
Impaired Water 
A water is polluted or 'impaired' if it does not support full use by humans, wildlife, fish and other aquatic life and it is shown that one or more of the pollutant criteria are not met.
Yes

Fish and Aquatic Life

Current Use
The use the water currently supports. This is not a designation or classification; it is based on the current condition of the water. Information in this column is not designed for, and should not be used for, regulatory purposes.
Restricted Aquatic Life
Fish and Aquatic Life communities are not fully supported in this ecosystem.
Attainable Use
The use that the investigator believes the water could achieve through managing "controllable" sources. Beaver dams, hydroelectric dams, low gradient streams, and naturally occurring low flows are generally not considered controllable. The attainable use may be the same as the current use or it may be higher.
Cold
Streams capable of supporting a cold water sport fishery, or serving as a spawning area for salmonids and other cold water fish species. Representative aquatic life communities, associated with these waters, generally require cold temperatures and concentrations of dissolved oxygen that remain above 6 mg/L. Since these waters are capable of supporting natural reproduction, a minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of 7 mg/L is required during times of active spawning and support of early life stages of newly-hatched fish.
Designated Use
This is the water classification legally recognized by NR102 and NR104, Wis. Adm. Code. The classification determines water quality criteria and effluent limits. Waters obtain designated uses through classification procedures.
Cold
Streams capable of supporting a cold water sport fishery, or serving as a spawning area for salmonids and other cold water fish species. Representative aquatic life communities, associated with these waters, generally require cold temperatures and concentrations of dissolved oxygen that remain above 6 mg/L. Since these waters are capable of supporting natural reproduction, a minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of 7 mg/L is required during times of active spawning and support of early life stages of newly-hatched fish.

Overview

Hog Island was contaminated with metals and PAHs from activities associated with the Murphy Oil Refinery in Superior. In 2005 and 2006, the area was remediated using funds from the Great Lake Legacy Act and from Murphy Oil. In 2007, a plan was developed to restore habitat at the site. Douglas County has adopted some of the actions in the plan, and has been implementing those actions with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2009 and 2010 and will continue work at the site in 2011.

Date  2011

Author  Nancy Larson

Historical Description

Newton Creek is an approximately 1.8 mile long stream located within the City of Superior. It is a tributary to Hog Island Inlet, on the southeastern end of Superior Bay. Newton Creek drains a wetland area just west of the Murphy Oil refinery in Superior, Wisconsin and flows through industrial and residential areas before emptying into the approximately 17-acre inlet. While the wetland area contributes to baseflow, without discharge from Murphy Oil as its primary source water, Newton Creek would otherwise be intermittent at times. In 1990, Newton Creek was recommended for classification as limited forage fishery (LFF) (Newton Creek/Hog Island Inlet, Douglas County, Murphy Oil WWTP Use Designation, Bub), based primarily on low and potentially intermittent natural flows. Hog Island Inlet was recommended to be classified for fish and aquatic life uses consistent with great lakes communities.

Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet were both added to the federal 303(d) list of impaired waters for chronic aquatic toxicity in April, 1998. Prior to remediation efforts, Newton Creek contained only limited aquatic life due to severe pollution, with contamination from Murphy Oil into Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet well documented (see Lake Superior Basin Water Quality Management Plan, WDNR, 1999; Construction Documentation and Post-Remediation Monitoring Report, WDNR and SEH, 2007). During studies of the two waters, WDNR had determined that exposure to PAH-contaminated sediments and suspended sediments in the water column posed unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. In addition to PAH’s, pollutants of concern included diesel range organics, metals, and high phosphorus levels among other substances resulting in acute and chronic toxicity to aquatic life, as well as dissolved oxygen levels in some reaches that sometimes were below 5 mg/l.

The WDNR divided Newton Creek into 12 segments (A through L) in 1994 in order to organize cleanup efforts. Reclamation Segment A, an impoundment area at Murphy Oil, was done by Murphy Oil under WDNR supervision in 1997. This was followed by cleanup of Segments B through K in the summer of 2003. The final phase occurred between July to November 2005 with the removal of contaminated sediment from 15 acres of Hog Island Inlet and also Segment L of Newton Creek using funds from the Great Lakes Legacy Act. Wisconsin DNR partnered with the EPA’s Great lakes National Program Office to complete this portion of the project. In all, nearly 55,000 tons of contaminated sediment was removed from Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet.

Post-remediation monitoring and sampling was conducted in Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet following cleanup efforts. PAH contamination levels in the sediment did not appear to pose unacceptable risks to human health or the environment and results from macroinvertebrate sampling in 2006 indicated some positive steps toward recovery and potential future delisting. However, it was clear that recovery of aquatic life and complete biological recolonization of Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet to levels appropriate to use designations assigned for each waterbody, respectively, would take more time after reclamation efforts (Schmude, 2006). In addition to acceptable levels of cleanup of pollutants and contaminated sediment, it was determined that biological recovery would need to take place before de-listing could take place.

In 2008, a three-year special project was proposed that is currently ongoing (2008-2011) to assess the continued biological recoveryof Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet after remediation/restoration efforts. Preliminary findings in 2008-09 indicate at least some improvement in the biological diversity from 2006 levels. Biological monitoring should continue through 2010. Results obtained during all years of this monitoring will determine if either waterbody can be delisted from the 303d list of impaired waters. Additionally, a plan was developed in 2007 for habitat restoration of Hog Island Inlet. Douglas County has adopted some of the actions in the plan, and has been implementing those actions with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2009 and 2010 and will continue work at the site in 2011.

Date  2011

Author  Nancy Larson

Hog Island Inlet, St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed (LS01) Fish and Aquatic LifeHog Island Inlet, St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed (LS01) RecreationHog Island Inlet, St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed (LS01) Fish Consumption

Condition

Wisconsin has over 84,000 miles of streams, 15,000 lakes and milllions of acres of wetlands. Assessing the condition of this vast amount of water is challenging. The state's water monitoring program uses a media-based, cross-program approach to analyze water condition. An updated monitoring strategy (2015-2020) is now available. Compliance with Clean Water Act fishable, swimmable standards are located in the Executive Summary of Water Condition in 2018. See also the 'monitoring and projects' tab.

Reports

Management Goals

Wisconsin's Water Quality Standards provide qualitative and quantitative goals for waters that are protective of Fishable, Swimmable conditions [Learn more]. Waters that do not meet water quality standards are considered impaired and restoration actions are planned and carried out until the water is once again fishable and swimmable

Management goals can include creation or implementation of a Total Maximum Daily Load analysis, a Nine Key Element Plan, or other restoration work, education and outreach and more. If specific recommendations exist for this water, they will be displayed below online.

Monitoring

Monitoring the condition of a river, stream, or lake includes gathering physical, chemical, biological, and habitat data. Comprehensive studies often gather all these parameters in great detail, while lighter assessment events will involve sampling physical, chemical and biological data such as macroinvertebrates. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities integrate watershed or catchment condition, providing great insight into overall ecosystem health. Chemical and habitat parameters tell researchers more about human induced problems including contaminated runoff, point source dischargers, or habitat issues that foster or limit the potential of aquatic communities to thrive in a given area. Wisconsin's Water Monitoring Strategy was recenty updated.

Grants and Management Projects

Monitoring Projects

Watershed Characteristics

Superior Bay is located in the St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River watershed which is 159.67 mi². Land use in the watershed is primarily wetland (44.10%), forest (32.50%) and a mix of grassland (11.10%) and other uses (12.40%). This watershed has 432.66 stream miles, 8,490.75 lake acres and 26,945.85 wetland acres.

Nonpoint Source Characteristics

This watershed is ranked Not Ranked for runoff impacts on streams, Not Available for runoff impacts on lakes and Low for runoff impacts on groundwater and therefore has an overall rank of Low. This value can be used in ranking the watershed or individual waterbodies for grant funding under state and county programs.However, all waters are affected by diffuse pollutant sources regardless of initial water quality. Applications for specific runoff projects under state or county grant programs may be pursued. For more information, go to surface water program grants.

Natural Community

Hog Island Inlet's natural community is not yet identified under the state’s Natural Community Determinations.

Natural communities (stream and lake natural communities) represent model results and DNR staff valiation processes that confirm or update predicted conditions based on flow and temperature modeling from historic and current landscape features and related variables. Predicated flow and temperatures for waters are associated predicated fish assemblages (communities). Biologists evaluate the model results against current survey data to determine if the modeled results are corect and whether biological indicators show water quaity degradation. This analysis is a core component of the state's resource management framework. Wisconsin's Riverine Natural Communities.

More Interactive Maps