Lodi Creek, Lake Wisconsin Watershed (LW19)
Return to Search
Lodi Creek, Lake Wisconsin Watershed (LW19)
Lodi Creek (1261900)
8.28 Miles
0 - 8.28
Natural Community
Natural communities (stream and lake natural communities) represent model results that use predicted flow and temperature based on landscape features and related assumptions. Ranges of flow and temperature associated with specific aquatic life communities (fish, macroinvertebrates) help biologists identify appropriate resource management goals. Wisconsin Natural Communities.
Cool-Cold Mainstem, Coldwater
Year Last Monitored
This is the most recent date of monitoring data stored in SWIMS. Additional surveys for fish and habitat may be available subsequent to this date.
2023
Good
 
Columbia
Trout Water 
Trout Waters are represented by Class I, Class II or Class III waters. These classes have specific ecological characteristics and management actions associated with them. For more information regarding Trout Classifications, see the Fisheries Trout Class Webpages.
Yes
Outstanding or Exceptional 
Wisconsin has designated many of the state's highest quality waters as Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) or Exceptional Resource Waters (ERWs). Waters designated as ORW or ERW are surface waters which provide outstanding recreational opportunities, support valuable fisheries and wildlife habitat, have good water quality, and are not significantly impacted by human activities. ORW and ERW status identifies waters that the State of Wisconsin has determined warrant additional protection from the effects of pollution. These designations are intended to meet federal Clean Water Act obligations requiring Wisconsin to adopt an 'antidegradation' policy that is designed to prevent any lowering of water quality - especially in those waters having significant ecological or cultural value.
No
Impaired Water 
A water is polluted or 'impaired' if it does not support full use by humans, wildlife, fish and other aquatic life and it is shown that one or more of the pollutant criteria are not met.
No

Fish and Aquatic Life

Current Use
The use the water currently supports. This is not a designation or classification; it is based on the current condition of the water. Information in this column is not designed for, and should not be used for, regulatory purposes.
Supported Aquatic Life
Waters that support fish and aquatic life communities (healthy biological communities).
Attainable Use
The use that the investigator believes the water could achieve through managing "controllable" sources. Beaver dams, hydroelectric dams, low gradient streams, and naturally occurring low flows are generally not considered controllable. The attainable use may be the same as the current use or it may be higher.
Cold (Class II Trout)
Streams supporting a cold water sport fishery, or serving as a spawning area for salmonids and other cold water fish species. Representative aquatic life communities, associated with these waters, generally require cold temperatures and concentrations of dissolved oxygen that remain above 6 mg/L through natural reproduction and selective propagation. Since these waters are capable of supporting natural reproduction, a minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of 7 mg/L is required during times of active spawning and support of early life stages of newly-hatched fish.
Designated Use
This is the water classification legally recognized by NR102 and NR104, Wis. Adm. Code. The classification determines water quality criteria and effluent limits. Waters obtain designated uses through classification procedures.
Cold
Streams capable of supporting a cold water sport fishery, or serving as a spawning area for salmonids and other cold water fish species. Representative aquatic life communities, associated with these waters, generally require cold temperatures and concentrations of dissolved oxygen that remain above 6 mg/L. Since these waters are capable of supporting natural reproduction, a minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of 7 mg/L is required during times of active spawning and support of early life stages of newly-hatched fish.

Overview

Spring Creek flows into Lake Wisconsin in Columbia County. It is Class II trout stream and the four miles of Class II in Dane County are considered an exceptional resource water (ERW). The stream flows through the Lodi Marsh State Wildlife Area above Lodi and is well buffered from agricultural impacts. Downstream of Lodi, the stream has experienced a decline in the natural reproduction of trout, which has been a cause of concern. Although significant spawning does occur in the riffles within the city limits, the stream has been straightened and lacks suitable hiding cover for fingerling fish. The WDNR has made efforts to address this problem and have completed a total of about one mile of stream habitat improvement work on
different sections. In addition, a 15" minimum size limit has increased the number of 12" to 14" and 15" fish on the lower section of the stream. Additional habitat improvement along the stream on village park lands would help to improve this problem. Soil loss in the town of Lodi has been estimated at 6.1 tons per acre per year. This addition of soil to the stream,
combined with sedimentation due to bank erosion and inputs from nearby barnyards can potentially cause more problems in the stream. One further threat to the creek is the result of the tremendous growth in the Town and City of Lodi. Housing and industrial development has increased in the past 5 years. This development contributes a large volume of stormwater to the stream and is a major source of nonpoint source pollution. Spring Creek receives point source discharge from both a municipal and industrial source. The City of Lodi has recently renovated their treatment plant.From:

Ripp, Coreen, Koperski, Cindy and Folstad, Jason. 2002. The State of the Lower Wisconsin River Basin. PUBL WT-559-2002. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.

Date  2002

Author  Cynthia Koperski

Historical Description

Spring Creek flows into Lake Wisconsin in Columbia County. It is Class II trout stream for 10 miles of its length (WDNR, 1980). The four miles of Class II in Dane County were nominated for exceptional resource water status under the state's antidegradation rules (WDNR, 1991). The stream flows through the Lodi Marsh State Wildlife Area above Lodi and is well buffered front agricultural impacts. Downstream of Lodi, sedimentation occurs due to bank erosion. Runoff from nearby barnyards may be a problem. The average annual soil loss for the town of Lodi, through which the stream flows, is 6.1 tons per acre per year (Kidney, 1987). An irrigation pipeline carrying process wastewater from a canning factory broke in 1991. About 6,000 gallons of wastewater reached the
stream. No known damage to the fishery of the stream occurred (WDNR, 1991).

Date  1994

Author   Surface Water Inventory Of Wisconsin

Historical Description

Spring Creek originates in northern Dane Township and flows north into Columbia County where it joins the Wisconsin River. In Dane County it drains 23 square miles of pasture and marsh, where it has a much lower gradient of 3.4 ft/mlie. There are no inputs of municipal or industrial wastes to Spring Creek, but pastureland runoff, erosion, and associated livestock-related damage are problems that affect the creek (Dane Cty. Reg. Plann. Comm. 1979a}.

Lodi Marsh, which adjoins the creek, is one of Dane County's most diverse wetlands. There are several springs within the marsh and further downstream that supply the creek with cool water (Dane Cty. Reg. Plonn. Comm. 1979a). The lower part of the creek is managed for trout and has a Class II rating. Lack of a gravel substrate prohibits natural reproduction. The DNR owns 1,002 acres of marshland and uplands in this watershed (including land in Columbia County) which provide excellent access. Waterfowl, pheasant, and furbearer production is good in the Lodi Marsh; thus, hunting and trapping are popular sports. Fish species: brown trout, central mudminnow, northern and southern redbelly dace, fathead minnow, creek chub, pearl dace, white sucker, brook stickleback, and mottled sculpin.

Spring Creek (Lodi Creek, Lodi Marsh Creek) (Dane Township) -T9N, R8E, Sec. 4, Surface acres = 4, Length = 3.5 miles, Stream order = II, Gradient = 41.3 ft/mile, Base discharge = 5 cfs. From: Day, Elizabeth A.; Grzebieniak, Gayle P.; Osterby, Kurt M.; and Brynildson, Clifford L., 1985. Lake and Stream Classification Project. Surface Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.

Date  1985

Author   Surface Water Inventory Of Wisconsin

Historical Description

Spring Creek (Lodi) T10N, R8E, Section 17, Surface Acres = 27.20, Miles = 8.0, Gradient = 6.50 feet per mile. A spring-fed stream which originates in a marshy area in Dane County and flows through Lodi to Lake Wisconsin. Private fish hatcheries have capitalized on several of the main feeder-springs downstream from Lodi; however, water quality remains suitable for a good population of brown and rainbow trout. These species are stocked annually to complement the native reproduction of brook trout. The Conservation Department owns over 393 acres in Dane County on this stream, most of which is marshland to be managed for upland game. About 735 acres of non-wooded marshland border the stream in Columbia.

From: Poff, Ronald J. and C.W. Threinen, 1965. Surface Water Resources of Columbia County: Lake and Stream Classification Project. Wisconsin Conservation Department, Madison, WI.

Date  1965

Author   Surface Water Inventory Of Wisconsin

Lodi Creek, Lake Wisconsin Watershed (LW19) Fish and Aquatic LifeLodi Creek, Lake Wisconsin Watershed (LW19) RecreationLodi Creek, Lake Wisconsin Watershed (LW19) Fish Consumption

General Condition

Spring Creek monitoring for fish and habitat between 2008 and 2012 shows that the stream is meeting designated use as Cold Class II trout stream, and in general the stream is in good to excellent health based on Fish IBI and qualitative habitat scores. Three major tributaries were also monitored, but are not in as good health as the main channel.

Date  2013

Author  Jean Unmuth

General Condition

Spring Creek is listed as a natural community cool-cold transition headwater, while the south tributary and Bohlman Branch are cold headwater streams. The thermal criteria set forth in state standards for cold water streams lists the maximum instantaneous temperature as <25 degrees Celsius, while the cool water maximum instantaneous temperature criteria is 25-28 degrees Celsius. Average water temperatures were well below the thermal criteria for Spring Creek and its tributaries, and within the preferred temperature range for trout. Maximum temperatures at all sites were below the thermal criteria. The highest water temperature of 23.9 occurred at Site 1 (Riddle Road) above the City of Lodi. Air temperatures on this date were also the highest documented over the entire sampling period.

Date  2010

Author  Jean Unmuth

Condition

Wisconsin has over 84,000 miles of streams, 15,000 lakes and milllions of acres of wetlands. Assessing the condition of this vast amount of water is challenging. The state's water monitoring program uses a media-based, cross-program approach to analyze water condition. An updated monitoring strategy (2015-2020) is now available. Compliance with Clean Water Act fishable, swimmable standards are located in the Executive Summary of Water Condition in 2018. See also the 'monitoring and projects' tab.

Reports

CLP_20230614_1261900_10041568_SpringCreekinLodi_Adler_B
2020 Comprehensive WQ Assessments
2018 List of Healthy (Category 2) Waters
Comprehensive 2018 River/Stream Water Quality Assessments
2016 Total Phosphorus Monitoring Report - Spring Creek at DS STH 113
Comprehensive 2016 Rivers Stream Assessments
2013 Total Phosphorus Monitoring Report -Lodi-Spring Creek Cty J Up To Lodi Sewage Treatment Plant
2013 Total Phosphorus Monitoring Report -Spring Creek DS STH 113
Spring Creek Citizen Monitoring Watershed Survey
LODI SPRING CREEK 2006 IMPAIRED WATERS
SPRING CREEK, COLUMBIA COUNTY, LODI STP WWTP USE DESIGNATION
Columbia County Surface Water Resources 1965

Recommendations

Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
Monitor Water Quality or Sediment
Category 2. Assessed as a cold stream instead of warm-small. Sites are not representative of the stream and therefore no change. 2018 TP Results: May Exceed. Station: 10039888. AU: 13504.
Water Quality Modeling
Description of products or deliverables are as follows: Model Identification * Overview of possible river models, contrasting model strengths and weaknesses. * Selection of an appropriate river model for water quality analysis and adaptive management follow up modeling will be selected for use on Spring Creek. Build out Scenarios * Two sets of products will be established related to the baseline land use inventory. The first product is a set of maps depicting the existing conditions of the surface watersheds. The maps will include existing land uses, tax parcel boundaries, orthophotography, and environmental constraints. The second product will be a set of statistics that measure the percent and acreages of developed and undeveloped land uses as well as environmental constraints. * A review of the existing regulatory framework will be compiled in a brief report that summarizes regulatory findings for the ground and surface watersheds and by jurisdiction. If significant differences are found among jurisdictions, a matrix will be compiled to illustrate the differences. * A set of maps and set of statistics will be compiled for a build out assessment of the surface watershed. The maps will detail areas that are available and unavailable for future development. Statistics will identify how many acres are available for future development and how many additional development units are possible with existing regulations. The change in potential impervious surface will be calculated and displayed on a map. * Statistics will be derived that determine how much change in phosphorus loading is possible for the surface watershed based on the build-out scenarios. * Final report
County Land and Water Management Plan
Columbia County Land and Water Conservation Dept. will sponsor a project to build upon previous monitoring work and continue the quantitative water quality monitoring program that will provide the ability to access stream loading impacts, impacts of urban verses rural and use developed models to move toward corrective measures that will provide the most beneficial use of resources. Project will provide water quality sampling data, lab results and project summary of data collected for year one and two. A final data summary of existing and previous year's data will be completed and compiled at the conclusion of the 2012 monitoring season.
Monitor Water Quality or Sediment
Water Quality Monitoring, Analysis, Interpretation, Recomendations and Reporting: 1) Construction and field placement of siphon samplers and 5 sampling locations ($4480) 2) Analysis of samples gathered at water quality sampling locations ($9800) 3) Columbia County LWCD technical staff management of the monitoring stations, data collection, and data input, education, public involvement and recommendations ($5000) This component includes collecting water quality data, interpreting the data, having those analysis run to use in combination, interpreting the data, As you can see this project and the various components are part of a bigger long term approach that follows a historical approach that has worked well for us in the past under the guidance of our associates at UWSP CWSE.
Data analysis, report production
Review of Existing Information, Develop Model, Planning Meetings, Preliminary Watershed Scope/Analysis and Reporting Data review that will be carried out by UWSP staff and supervisors. This will include pulling together existing data, both historical and newly gathered and create a foundation for that information to work into the bigger project. ($5000) 1) UWSP Supervision and oversight, meetings, set up planning, documentation etc. ($3000) 2) Columbia County LWCD technical staff resources to set up, coordinate and get project moving along ($5000) 3) Develop rating curve, gathering in the field data to use for future calculation and coordination of water quality data ($5000) 4) Misc work, and transportion($1350) This component will largely consist of doing background work on existing data, the set up of the 5 sampling locations that will be used throughout project, and the ongoing in field data gathering related to the development of a rating curve that will be used in coordination with component #2 water quality data. A separate project report on accomplishments will be prepared for this project.
Watershed Mapping or Assessment
Review of Existing Information, Develop Model, Planning Meetings, Preliminary Watershed Scope/Analysis and Reporting Data review that will be carried out by UWSP staff and supervisors. This will include pulling together existing data, both historical and newly gathered and create a foundation for that information to work into the bigger project. ($5000) 1) UWSP Supervision and oversight, meetings, set up planning, documentation etc. ($3000) 2) Columbia County LWCD technical staff resources to set up, coordinate and get project moving along ($5000) 3) Develop rating curve, gathering in the field data to use for future calculation and coordination of water quality data ($5000) 4) Misc work, and transportion($1350) This component will largely consist of doing background work on existing data, the set up of the 5 sampling locations that will be used throughout project, and the ongoing in field data gathering related to the development of a rating curve that will be used in coordination with component #2 water quality data. A separate project report on accomplishments will be prepared for this project.
County Land and Water Management Plan
Columbia County Land and Water Conservation Department will sponsor a project on Spring Creek, Columbia County, to complete a watershed impacts needs inventory. This watershed resource gathering process will be an important step in the development of a long-term management plan for Spring Creek.
Watershed Mapping or Assessment
The Friends of Scenic Lodi Valley will sponsor a project involving Lodi Spring Creek, Columbia County. This watershed study will be a 5-year documentation of 4 sites for the purpose of measuring water levels and establishing flow rates. Project deliverables include 1) WAV training for local volunteers with invites to neighboring communities; 2) purchase of supplies to outfit volunteers and construct data logger posts; and 3) collection of monthly logger data to be shared with Columbia County LWCD, other partners, and the public.
Engage Volunteers in Monitoring/Restoration
The Friends of Scenic Lodi will establish an ongoing network of water quality monitoring volunteers and foster local stream stewardship for stream protection and enhancement.

Management Goals

Wisconsin's Water Quality Standards provide qualitative and quantitative goals for waters that are protective of Fishable, Swimmable conditions [Learn more]. Waters that do not meet water quality standards are considered impaired and restoration actions are planned and carried out until the water is once again fishable and swimmable

Management goals can include creation or implementation of a Total Maximum Daily Load analysis, a Nine Key Element Plan, or other restoration work, education and outreach and more. If specific recommendations exist for this water, they will be displayed below online.

Monitoring

Monitoring the condition of a river, stream, or lake includes gathering physical, chemical, biological, and habitat data. Comprehensive studies often gather all these parameters in great detail, while lighter assessment events will involve sampling physical, chemical and biological data such as macroinvertebrates. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities integrate watershed or catchment condition, providing great insight into overall ecosystem health. Chemical and habitat parameters tell researchers more about human induced problems including contaminated runoff, point source dischargers, or habitat issues that foster or limit the potential of aquatic communities to thrive in a given area. Wisconsin's Water Monitoring Strategy was recenty updated.

Grants and Management Projects

Project Name (Click for Details)Year Started
COLUMBIA COUNTY: Spring Creek Targeted WQ Monitoring Part #22010
CITY OF LODI: SW Utility & Southwest Plan2007
Spring Cr. Below culvert Fair St. Below Bridge Bank right2010
COLUMBIA COUNTY: Spring Creek Watershed Impact Inventory2008
COLUMBIA COUNTY: Spring Creek Crk Targeted WQ Monitoring Part #12010
Spring Cr. Storm Pond Outlet STH 602011
Monitoring Recommendations Stemming from CWA / IR Listings2000
COLUMBIA COUNTY: Spring Creek WQ Analysis & Modeling2013
Spring Creek downstream of Sewage Treatment2010
FRIENDS OF SCENIC LODI: Lodi Spring Creek Watershed Survey2008
Spring Creek 200M downstream of Fair St2009
Spring Creek upstream of Sewage Treatment Plant2010
Spring Cr. Below box culvert behind Associated Bank2010
Spring Cr. Stormwater Outlet downstream Riddle Road2010
FRIENDS OF SCENIC LODI: Spring Creek Monitoring & Evaluation2001
Fish Propagation Actions2001
COLUMBIA COUNTY: Lodi Spring Creek Monitoring2012

Monitoring Projects

WBICOfficial Waterbody NameStation IDStation NameEarliest Fieldwork DateLatest Fieldwork DateView StationView Data
1261900Spring Creek10041568Spring Creek upstream from Sewage Treatment1/11/20146/14/2023MapData
1261900Spring Creek10034890Spring Cr. agricultural ditch outlet5/11/20111/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10011101Spring Creek - Spring Creek (Lodi) 25 Meters Upstream From Fair Street4/15/20024/15/2002MapData
1261900Spring Creek10031391Spring Creek (west branch) US of Riddle Rd Bridge4/13/20101/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10032275Spring Creek downstream of Sewage Treatment 4/6/20101/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10010951Spring Creek - Lodi-Spring Cr Sewage Treat. Plant to Fair St Bridge9/13/19997/14/2020MapData
1261900Spring Creek10032277Spring Cr. Stormwater Outlet downstream Riddle Road4/6/20101/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10032675Spring Creek betw. Fair St & Hwy 60 bridges LodiMapData
1261900Spring Creek10011029Spring Creek - Lodi-Spring Creek Upper Sth 113 Bridge Up To Dick Ryan Line FenceMapData
1261900Spring Creek10032279Spring Cr. Below culvert Fair St. Below Bridge Bank rightMapData
1261900Spring Creek10040455Spring Creek behind Lodi City Hall5/14/20097/23/2009MapData
1261900Spring Creek10011017Spring Creek - Lodi Spring Creek Upper Hwy 113 Bridge Upstream To Dick Ryan Line FenceMapData
1261900Spring Creek10011022Spring Creek - Lodi Spring Creek Fair Street Up To Hwy 60MapData
1261900Spring Creek10011030Spring Creek - Lodi- Dick Ryan Line Fence Up To Cty J10/11/20121/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10032278Spring Cr. Below box culvert behind Associated Bank5/11/20111/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10011568Spring Creek - Dnr Line Fence Upsrea To Lower Hwy 113 Bridge1/1/20151/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10011031Lodi-Spring Creek Cty J Up To Lodi Sewage Treatment Plant11/19/19966/14/2023MapData
1261900Spring Creek104449Lodi Spring CreekMapData
1261900Spring Creek10032281Spring Creek upstream STH 1134/6/20101/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10029948Spring Creek 200 M downstream of Fair St2/15/20099/13/2009MapData
1261900Spring Creek113097Spring (Lodi) Creek at Fair St.5/29/20028/5/2002MapData
1261900Spring Creek113096Spring (Lodi) Creek at Pleasant St.11/19/199610/17/2012MapData
1261900Spring Creek10037079Spring Creek (west branch) at Riddle Road Bridge5/16/20121/1/2015MapData
1261900Spring Creek10039888Spring Creek DS STH 113 5/22/201310/19/2016MapData

Monitoring Studies

The Friends of Scenic Lodi Valley are interested in protecting the stream and have proposed a citizen stream monitoring program. Monitoring was conducted in 1999 and 2000 to collect some baseline data for this project. Fisheries surveys found several cold water indicator species in the creek and a few pollution intolerant species, but overall, there were more pollution tolerant species (white suckers and creek chubs) than other species. Similarly, macroinvertebrates collected were indicative of good quality water, yet below the city, the macroinvertebrates collected were indicative of stream disturbance, which could potentially be attributed to urban stormwater runoff from the City of Lodi.

To assist them with their efforts to protect and improve Spring Creek, the Friends of the Scenic Lodi Valley have received a River Planning Grant. The grant will help them to organize a stream monitoring network. The monitors will gather valuable information that will help to evaluate the overall health of the stream. The Friends plan on using the grant to conduct a watershed assessment to identify potential pollution sources and inventory land use
near the stream. The grant is a cooperative project between the City of Lodi, the WDNR, Trout Unlimited, Lodi Canning and the Friends of the Scenic Lodi Valley.

Ripp, Coreen, Koperski, Cindy and Folstad, Jason. 2002. The State of the Lower Wisconsin River Basin. PUBL WT-559-2002. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.

Date  2002

Author  Cynthia Koperski

Watershed Characteristics

Spring Creek is located in the Lake Wisconsin watershed which is 214.96 mi². Land use in the watershed is primarily agricultural (42.60%), forest (28%) and a mix of grassland (13.10%) and other uses (16.40%). This watershed has 299.58 stream miles, 521.55 lake acres and 6,644.90 wetland acres.

Nonpoint Source Characteristics

This watershed is ranked Medium for runoff impacts on streams, Low for runoff impacts on lakes and High for runoff impacts on groundwater and therefore has an overall rank of High. This value can be used in ranking the watershed or individual waterbodies for grant funding under state and county programs.However, all waters are affected by diffuse pollutant sources regardless of initial water quality. Applications for specific runoff projects under state or county grant programs may be pursued. For more information, go to surface water program grants.

Natural Community

Lodi Creek is considered a Cool-Cold Mainstem, Coldwater under the state's Natural Community Determinations.

Natural communities (stream and lake natural communities) represent model results and DNR staff valiation processes that confirm or update predicted conditions based on flow and temperature modeling from historic and current landscape features and related variables. Predicated flow and temperatures for waters are associated predicated fish assemblages (communities). Biologists evaluate the model results against current survey data to determine if the modeled results are corect and whether biological indicators show water quaity degradation. This analysis is a core component of the state's resource management framework. Wisconsin's Riverine Natural Communities.

Cool (Cold-Transition) Mainstem streams are moderate-to-large but still wadeable perennial streams with cold to cool summer temperatures. Coldwater fishes are common to uncommon, transitional fishes are abundant to common, and warm water fishes are uncommon to absent. Headwater species are common to absent, mainstem species are abundant to common, and river species are common to absent.

More Interactive Maps
View Water in Alternative Map